1. Social Welfare Policy, Veterans medical
benefits: Current and retired military people are covered
by medical insurance programs much like those offered by private
employers. Veterans are also covered by benefits for service-related
conditions under Veterans Administration programs that are funded
by taxes. Some members of Congress have questioned this expensive
dual-track system and sought to eliminate duplication and reduce
government spending. Is this a good idea? What are the costs and
benefits of these proposals?
2. Economic Policy, Communications Deregulation
and Competition: Local phone companies want to offer
long distance and cable TV service. Cable TV companies want to
offer local telephone and electronic networking services. Long
distance and cellular phone companies want to offer cable TV,
local phone service, and electronic networking. All of them are
lobbying Congress to deregulate the communications industry and
take measures to facilitate competition. Isnt the industry
already deregulated? Isnt there already competition? Are
deregulation and competition really good ideas? What are the costs
and benefits? What should Congress do?
3. Social Welfare Policy, People without
health insurance: Nearly everyone agrees that the US
has a problem when over 42 million people dont have health
care insurance. The conservative Heritage Foundation asserts,
Although the United States continues to be a world leader
in providing quality and innovation in medical products and services,
the challenge of developing a more rational and equitable way
to finance health care for America's working families persists.
Despite more than a decade of intense effort by federal and state
policy makers, the problems are getting worse, not better.
The big questions surround proposals for solutions.
What approaches seem most reasonable? What seems most likely to
work? Which ideas are most politically palatable?
4. Civil Liberties Policy, Data Privacy:
Congress enacted an overhaul of privacy within the financial services
industry in November 1999. As part of this legislation, the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) issued final rules to heavily restrict
the business of selling names, addresses and Social Security numbers
by giving consumers the option to stop such transactions. Hitherto,
credit bureaus consistently sold the personal details at the top
of every credit report of approximately 200 million US citizens.
Buyers use the information for marketing, fraud prevention, and
people locator programs.
Data merchants are in opposition and argue that the FTC has overstepped
its authority by changing the definition of financial information.
They claim the rule will have a negative affect on the free flow
of information. However, the House Banking Committee maintains
that the FTCs ruling holds to the intentions of the bills
authors. The legislation also restricts financial firms from sharing
customers financial information with unaffiliated companies
but allowed them to share the data with subsidiary firms. In Minnesota,
at least two large bank corporations have had conflicts with the
Attorney General over their data sharing practices. Lobbyists
on both sides of the issue are in regular contact with Banking
Committee members.
Are there too many restrictions on personal data commerce? Or
are there so many loopholes that privacy is really not protected?
5. Social Welfare Policy, Ergonomics:
In June, President Bush signed a bill to block a proposed Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rule requiring employers
to set up repetitive-motion injury prevention programs. "There
needs to be a balance between and an understanding of the costs
and benefits associated with federal regulations," Mr. Bush
said in a statement. "The ergonomics rule would have cost
both large and small employers billions of dollars and presented
employers with overwhelming compliance challenges."
Most of the companies that would have to comply with the rule
also happen to oppose it. The proposed program compels companies
to identify and correct problems and compensate workers for injuries
related to the design of the workplace.
"We have a new rule that's been promulgated that would cause
extreme damage to our workplace," Rep. Anne Northup, R-Ky.,
said during House debate. "We heard the same voices
when they opposed the OSHA program," Sen. Edward Kennedy,
D-Mass. "Well, I'll tell you this: It's reduced the number
of deaths in the workplace by half."
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has estimated
the rules would cost businesses about $4.5 billion in compliance
costs but would result in $9 billion in savings by reducing injuries.
Business groups put the cost of compliance much higher, at more
than $90 billion a year. OSHA officials say 1.8 million workers
in the United States have injuries related to ergonomics, with
600,000 missing work each year as a result.
Can you determine indisputable facts? If the problem is as big
as described, are there cost-effective solutions? This issue seems
driven by partisan politics. Is there any likelihood of compromise?
What would that look like?
6. Environmental Policy, hydropower/free rivers:
Hundreds of dams on American rivers are up for relicensing. Most
of these rivers are in the west and southeast of the USA, however
some are in Minnesota and Wisconsin. The Rivers Unplugged Campaign
of American Rivers advocates removing dams from rivers to improve
biodiversity, fisheries, recreation, and flood protection As an
alternative to removing dams, the group advocates renovating necessary
hydropower dams with new technology so they are less damaging
to the environment. The National Hydropower Association urges
Congress to ensure unrestricted relicensing of existing dams and
building of new ones to help solve the countrys energy problems.
Both sides argue about the role of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
in the process.
How should Congress get involved? Should the Corps of Engineers
be reformed? Should hydropower production be encouraged and facilitated?
Should more dams be removed to protect species and habitats?
7. Environmental Policy, Endangered and Threatened
Species: The controversies over the preservation of
species (wolves in Yellowstone, owls in Washington, or dwarf trout
lilies in Minnesota) never seem to end. (The Wyoming Farm Bureau
sued the federal government to force the removal of wolves from
Yellowstone National Park in order to reduce predation on cattle
grazing on National Forest land adjacent to the park.) Is present
government policy too restrictive of private property and economic
rights or not protective enough of endangered and threatened species?
Does the law and policy hamstring our efforts to produce more
energy? Or have the laws been successful and are no longer needed?
How will the most recent Supreme Court ruling limit the ability
of Congress to legislate in this area?
8. Military/Economic Policy, Facilitating the
transition of the American aircraft industry from a primarily
military industry to a civilian industry: The market
has promoted consolidation of the industry as military spending
has declined, but US government policies and unfair restrictions
by other countries stand in the path of this transition. What
can Congress do to ensure the survival and health of this vital
industry in our manufacturing sector? What can Congress do to
help the industry be more competitive on the world market? Or
is this one of those cases where the government ought to simply
get out of the way and allow the markets and the private sector
operate?
9. Social Welfare Policy, Highway worker safety:
Weve all seen the signs. Fines Double in Work Zones.
In spite of the laws and public awareness campaigns, the number
of deaths and injuries annually in highway work zones are increasing.
Workers unions, construction companies, and OSHA are all
arguing for Congressional action to create safer highway construction
work areas. With interest groups all lined up on the same side
of an issue, action can be expected. What can Congress do? What
will be effective? What will be acceptable?
10. Environmental/Economic Policy, Preserving
commercial fisheries: Scientific findings reported
in July indicate that many , fish species in U.S. waters are at
risk of extinction. The Fisheries Recovery Act of 2001 aiming
to conserve ocean resources has been introduced. Is this bill
a good one? Should anyone but Representatives of coastal states
be concerned? Or is this just another example of special interest
legislation?
11. Economic Policy, Taxes on Internet Commerce:
Internet developers convinced Congress to exempt sales made over
the Internet from state and local sales taxes in order to give
the new industry a boost as it began. Now, traditional (bricks
and mortar and mail order) merchants argue that the exemption
provides an unfair advantage to Internet merchants. In addition,
state and local governments complain that lost revenues have made
the funding of local services more difficult. Is there good reason
to remove the exemption? Is it unfair? Does it threaten business?
Do consumers really benefit? Do states and local governments really
suffer?
12. Economic/Environmental Policies, Repeal
federal excise tax on gasoline?: The energy crisis,
regardless of the causes, is expensive. There has been a Federal
tax on gasoline since the 1930s. It is currently set at 18.4¢
a gallon. Many voices have quietly began urging Congress to repeal
the tax and reduce the cost of driving. This would in theory offer
some economic support to construction, automobile, and travel
industries. Other voices have been heard arguing for increases
in the excise tax to discourage use of gasoline. Would the repeal
or reduction of this tax offer significant advantages to these
industries? Would an increase have a salutary effect on the use
of gasoline? Where could Congress come up with the funds to compensate
for the loss of revenue? Would a repeal or reduction only lead
to increases of state and local taxes? Would a reduction lead
to an increase in demand for gasoline? What should Congress do?
13. Energy/Economic/Environmental Policy: What
role should alternative energy sources or new technologies have
in energy production? The Vice President said that
conservation and non-traditional energy sources are such a small
part of our energy potential that theyre nearly irrelevant.
A month later, after large-scale negative reaction to his comments,
he said (in Minnesota) that alternative energy sources must be
developed. Which sources should be encouraged? How? At what cost?
How does the cost of encouraging solar and wind power compare
to the cost of developing new oil, gas, and coal sources? Is promoting
conservation politically palatable and practically important?
14. Energy/Environmental Policy, Nuclear Power
and Nuclear Wastes: The Bush Administration touts nuclear
energy as a safe, clean solution to much of our energy shortage.
The opposition to nuclear power production is fierce. Many people
remember Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. Has technology made
nuclear power safer? Nuclear power plants may not pollute the
air, but they produce wastes for which we have no safe, permanent
disposal. In Goodhue County, Minnesota, nuclear wastes are temporarily
stored on an island in the Mississippi River. Efforts to create
a national, permanent waste disposal site have been thwarted by
unhappy state governments (notably Nevada and New Mexico). And
what about the huge amounts of water needed for nuclear power
production? What should federal policy and actions be on the issues
of nuclear power and nuclear waste? Should Congress act to change
the regulations, speed up the establishment of a permanent waste
disposal site, or create incentives for more production?
15. Military/Foreign Policy, Missile defense
system: The Bush Administration is adamant and united
that we need a missile defense system. They cite dangers from
missiles launched by nations like North Korea and Iraq. Critics
begin by saying the technology is unreliable, continue with arguments
about international treaties and politics. Many analysts also
suggest that nuclear terrorism with small weapons on boats or
in cars is a more realistic threat. Is a missile defense system
a good idea? Is it worth the diplomatic and economic costs? Will
it work?
16. Foreign Policy, Fast Track Authority:
For most of the past 35 years, Presidents have received
from Congress so called "fast track authority" to negotiate
international trade agreements. This authority means that Congress,
when presented with an agreement to consider, can only approve
or disapprove the whole thing (no amendments allowed). The controversy
over recent trade pacts (especially NAFTA and the proposed FTAA)
has generated opposition in Congress to fast track authority from
conservatives, moderates, and liberals. Congress did not renew
its authorization for this authority to President Clifton. Now
President Bush is asking for fast track authority to negotiate
an expansion of NAFTA. Is fast track a good idea? If so, how do
we convince its opponents? If not, what are the alternatives and
how do we advance them?
17. Environmental Policy, Hazardous and Toxic
Wastes and Brownfields: Businesses and individuals
continue to produce dangerous wastes. How do we dispose of them?
Old disposal sites need to be cleaned up. In addition, former
industrial sites, often polluted simply by the industrial activity,
need to be cleaned up before reuse. Critics have attacked the
Superfund law as too expensive for businesses. Others have praised
Superfunds successes. Any truth to either set of comments?
Who should pay for the clean up? Are our present policies adequate
to deal with the problem in the future? Native Americans have
asked that a former military facility in Arden Hills, Minnesota,
be made into a reservation (so they can build a casino close to
the metropolitan area), but there is so much pollution there that
some people say it will take fifty years to clean it all up. Entrepreneurs
have suggested giving the polluted land to anyone willing to clean
it up (sort of a modern version of The Homestead Act). Should
Congress continue to pursue the policies of the Superfund legislation?
Are alternative funding mechanisms necessary?
18. Social Welfare Policy, Prescription Drug
Costs: Proposals abound for extending Medicare to cover
the costs of prescription drugs. Such an extension of benefits
will be quite costly. What are the options for making drug costs
universally covered (they are covered in some states)? Its
politically popular, but is it really such a good idea?What are
the likely costs? What would be the most likely and acceptable
source of the money to make this change?
19. Social Welfare Policy, Standardized Testing
in Schools: There is a popular demand that schools
be accountable for the tax money they receive. One argument suggests
that schools must prove their students are progressing in terms
of educational achievement and that standardized tests are the
best way to prove that. How should standardized testing be implemented?
Can national standards be mandated in the face of the tradition
of local control of schools? Can states be allowed to decide when
and whether their schools have met national standards? Are test
the best way to demonstrate learning? Do the percentages of students
with learning disabilities and from poor families have any place
in the process of judging educational progress?
20. Agricultural Policy, the New England
dairy compact: The 1996 farm
bill passed by Congress allowed the formation of a compact among
New England states to set the price of milk sold in those states.
The stated purposes of the compact were to assure an adequate
milk supply for consumers, preserve dairy farmings cultural
and economic benefits, and to recognizing that the ability of
states to regulate milk prices collectively is in the public interest.
The New England dairy industry has been stimulated. Milk production
has increased. But milk from New England competes with milk from
states like Minnesota and Wisconsin whose farmers do not benefit
from the price guarantees in New England. Should Congress renew
the legislation that allows the existence of the NEDC? Should
dairy farmers in other parts of the country be granted the same
benefits as New England farmers? Or should the federal and state
governments just get out of the way and let the markets deal with
milk production?
21. Social Welfare Policy, Impediments to
transitions from welfare to work: As the deadline for eligibility
for welfare payments nears for some people, the difficulty of
getting off welfare for some is greater than anyone
expected. Things from child care to wardrobe to education to medical
insurance to transportation stand in the way of the transition.
Were things overlooked in the welfare reform of 1996? Are there
things Congress needs to do to make these transitions more possible?
Should the deadlines be relaxed for people?
22. Social Welfare/Economic Policy: Affordable Housing:
The boom in the real estate markets has been wonderful for people
who own property. The rising prices of housing has been less wonderful
for people trying to find housing, especially those average and
low income people who have benefited least from the economic boom
of the past decade. Markets seem unable to deal with the problem
since the biggest profits (i.e. incentives) are in high end housing.
Should Congress act to encourage more affordable housing? Are
subsidies to developers more efficient that support for individual
consumers? Or should incentives be aimed at local governments?
Should these incentives be offered through the existing FHA structure
or are more innovative programs needed?
23. Civil Rights Policy, Voting Standards: Last Novembers
election demonstrated flaws in the electoral system that threaten
the legitimacy of government. States jealously guard their prerogatives
when it comes to running elections. A recent Presidential Commission
made several recommendations, including scheduling elections on
a national holiday. Can Congress take steps to ensure that elections
will attract more voters and reflect public sentiment less questionably
without infringing on states rights? Which of the Commissions
recommendations are most feasible?
24. Foreign/Drug Policy: Colombia: The problems associated
with illegal drugs continue to plague the US. One of the fronts
for dealing with these problems is to disrupt the source of drugs.
Colombia has become a literal battleground in this aspect of the
war on drugs. Critics argue that attacking the demand for drugs
is a more effective strategy, that the military ought not be involved,
and that the environmental costs of present actions are unacceptable.
Some military critics argue that without an exit strategy
the war on drugs in Colombia could become another Vietnam. When
it comes before Congress, decisions will have to be made about
what to do and where. What should Congress do?
25. Civil Rights Policy, Comparable Worth: Some jobs, like
those of secretaries, are dominated by women; other jobs, those
of truck drivers for example, are dominated by men. Overall, jobs
dominated by men pay much better than jobs dominated by women.
Advocates of comparable worth argue that male dominated jobs do
not require greater skills or education than jobs dominated by
women. They say that the earnings differentials are caused
by sexist assumptions about the need for men to earn more. These
advocates say that jobs like truck driver and secretary are comparable
and that people doing them should earn about the same amounts.
State and local governments (e.g., in Minnesota) are making efforts
to determine the comparability of jobs and equalize wages. In
spite of those efforts, a report last January found that The gender
gap -- the difference between male and female wages -- actually
increased slightly over the course of this economic boom between
1993 and 1999. Should Congress take any action on this issue?
What action is feasible and workable? Can Congress require private
businesses as well as government employers to follow comparable
worth guidelines? Who should write the guidelines?
26. Social Welfare Policy, Americas
Cultural Capital: In the past decade there have been
loud battles over the National Endowments for the Humanities and
the Arts. Now, recommendations are being made which call upon
the President and the Congress to create new focal points for
cultural policies within the Federal Government. The recommendations
are geared toward bringing together the fragmented approach to
cultural policies at the federal level. "America's Cultural
Capital" is part of the Center for Arts and Culture's project
called "Art, Culture and the National Agenda" (ACNA),
which seeks to broaden and deepen the national conversation on
culture.People new to the argot of bureaucracy and legislation
might not understand what all this means. So, what does it mean?
Is this just another attempt to push a liberal agenda? Or is another
battle in the rights attempts to use government to enforce
its preferences in art and culture? Does the Federal Government
have a role in funding arts and culture? How about in preserving
art and culture? Should the National Endowment for the Arts be
replaced or reoriented? And the National Endowment for the Humanities?
27. Economic/Foreign/Trade Policy, Antidumping Laws: The
U.S. and many other countries have antidumping laws which prohibit
the importation of goods produced with government subsidies that
keep prices below actual costs of production. A new Trade Policy
Analysis, by the Cato Institutes Daniel Ikenson and Brink
Lindsey asserts that U.S. antidumping policies and their duplicates
in other countries are now starting to hurt U.S. business.Is it
time to stop trying to protect U.S. businesses from subsidized
competition? How? Or should the Federal Government do more to
promote U.S. businesses ability to compete?
28. Civil Liberties Policy, Regulating the Internet: Pornography
available on the Internet? Subversive political ideas and conspiracies
thriving in cyberspace? Critics claim the Internet is full of
sex aimed at children. They demand that, at the very least, school
and library computers should be insulated from obscenities. Others
worry about the ease of spreading subversive ideas and plans (bomb
making, for example). Arguments over how to and whether filtering
Internet content is possible proliferate. Congress tried regulation
once and found its law declared unconstitutional. Congress is
considering regulation once again. Should Congress act? How?
29. Civil Liberties Policy, Exclusionary Rule: Illegally
discovered evidence cannot be used in prosecuting suspected criminals.
This rule is designed to prevent police and prosecutors from going
on "fishing expeditions" for evidence, planting evidence,
or harassing people. Some people have argued that the rules and
court decisions regarding exclusion of evidence are too strict
and that rather than protecting innocent peoples rights
they only help prevent conviction of criminals. Should laws be
changed? How?
30. Civil Rights Policy, Americans with Disabilities Act:
This landmark legislation is considered by many people to be just
a first step. Others view it as an unnecessary intrusion by the
government into private enterprise and individual freedom. Others
worry about privacy issues and genetic testing. This issue is
becoming more controversial than ever. What amendments are worthy
of support? Are there actions that should be taken to ensure compliance?
Are there things that should be done to protect businesses from
exorbitant expenses or frivolous law suits? Have the recent Supreme
Court decisions solved the biggest problems (so Congress can turn
to other issues), or do those decisions require that Congress
act to fix things?
31. Environmental Policy, Water Quality:
Federal programs to help local governments build water and sewerage
treatment facilities have been very successful. Today the greatest
threats to water quality in the USA no longer come from identifiable
factories and cities, but they come from "non-point"
pollution sources (sources like agricultural, residential, and
parking lot run-off). At the same time, several million people
in the USA still do not have ready access to safe drinking water.
Can we reduce funding for water quality programs or must we shift
spending to other types of programs? Or is this a local problem,
that the federal government should leave to states?
32. Civil Liberties Policy, Illegal Immigration: The number
of illegal immigrants seems to be increasing every year. Arrests
at the Mall of America and rural Minnesota meat processing plants
demonstrate that the problem exists far from the US border with
Mexico. President Bush has called for a revision of U.S. policy
toward illegal immigrants. Is there some way to better prevent
people from illegally entering the US? Or are our immigration
laws just too strict? In the present tight labor market, the more
workers, it seems, the better, and nearly all illegal immigrants
are productive workers. What can and should Congress do about
immigration and residency policies?
33. Social Welfare Policy, National Parks: Visits to national
parks have reached record levels. Tight budgets and overuse have
delayed needed maintenance and degraded environments. Some of
the least visited areas have become sites of criminal activity
because so few rangers are on duty. Controversial proposals have
been made to ban private vehicles from Yosemite, Glacier, and
Grand Canyon parks and limit the number of visitors to Yellowstone
and the Great Smokeys.
How should we deal with these dilemmas? Should there be greater
restrictions on the use of parks? If so, is the government responsible
for the affects of those restrictions on businesses in and around
the parks? Should visitor fees be raised? Should taxes pay more
of the bills for the parks? What should the balance be between
user fees and public support? Should we create more parks? How
would we finance them? Or should we, as some have suggested, sell
the parks to private businesses subject to some restrictions on
land use to protect the environment?
34. Social Welfare Policy, Agriculture: The number of farmers
is decreasing, efficiency is increasing, and the concentration
of power in fewer and fewer hands has changed agricultural economics
whether we like it or not. (Population losses in rural areas of
the Great Plains are the greatest in the country.) Congress passed
the "Freedom to Farm" act with the goal of removing
the government from the agricultural marketplace. Nevertheless,
the role of the federal government in agriculturefrom milk
marketing orders to "set asides" grows. Nearly everyone
agrees that the law was a failure.
In the midst of nearly a decade of prosperity and record low unemployment,
farmers and agricultural areas are in economic crisis (Does this
sound like the 1920s?). Republicans and Democrats in Congress
compete with one another to approve spending for "emergency"
aid for farmers. Is the "family farm" an economic dinosaur
or a valuable social asset. Should Congress do more to adjust
basic farm policies in the next 20 years? Is there a way to get
the federal government out of the business of subsidizing agriculture?
Or is there a role for the government in the agricultural market?
35. Economic Policy, Preserving Property Values: When the
government make laws and policies they often affect the value
of private property. Everything from zoning laws to anti-pollution
regulations to the building of roads has an impact on property
values. Should the government (at all levels) have to compensate
property owners when government action reduces the value of property?
(In other words, should such actions be regarded as legally "taking"
part of the property and subject to the rules of eminent domain?)
Should property owners have to share with the government increases
in property values caused by government action and regulation?
How should changes in property values be determined? Should Congress
take action on this issue? If so, what action?
36. Civil Liberties Policy, Hate Speech:
Are some things so awful to say that they should be restricted?
Is it a legitimate limitation on free speech to prohibit threats
based on a "victims" religion, ethnicity, race,
or sexual orientation? Is such speech protected by the First Amendment,
and are "victims" offered adequate redress under other
laws? Or is this a phony issue (only another attempt to legislate
courtesy)? Can Congress construct laws that wont violate
the Constitution? How?
37. Civil Rights Policy, Minority Representation in Government:
Courts in some places have approved and, in other places, struck
down the designing of legislative districts to encourage the election
of minority representatives to Congress. Is this a good idea or
just another way of "Balkanizing" the USA? Will it promote
the integration of minority groups into the mainstream of US politics
or will it cause a hardening of the divisions that separate groups
in our society? What should Congress do about the issue? Or has
the most recent Supreme Court decision (fall, 1997) settled this
issue?
38. Social Welfare Policy, Managed Health Care and Patients
Rights: About 60% of Americans are covered by managed health
care plans. These organizations promised to limit costs and make
health insurance more accessible. However, the expected savings
have not always been delivered. And the satisfaction with the
quality of care varies widely from one plan to another. The problem
is perhaps less noticeable in Minnesota because state law prohibits
"for profit" managed care systems, but in other parts
of the country, problems are severe.
Does managed care mean lower quality service? Do managed care
companies need more government regulation? Do patients need a
"bill of rights?" Should patients have the right to
sue managed care organizations for malpractice? Some Minnesotas
legislators hold up the non-profit system as a solution. Is competition
for the non-profits a good idea? What should be done? How?
39. Social Welfare Policy, Animal Feedlots: Drive across
southern Kansas if you want to find out why some people are anxious
about the production of meat in the US. Huge feedlots not only
produce animals for meat, but more organic waste than small cities.
The smell will tell part of the problem. Polluted wells and neighbors
illnesses tell more. Cattle, pigs, chickens, and turkeys are produced
in large scale factory farms. All over the US the problems of
air and water pollution are growing.
Is the pollution dangerous as well as smelly? Should Congress
set standards for pollution control? Should sewerage treatment
be required for animal waste as well as human waste? Should the
problem or parts of it be left to the states?
40. Civil Liberties Policy, "Miranda rights":
In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested and questioned by police.
He was convicted on the evidence of his statements to police.
The Supreme Court eventually ruled that because Miranda had not
been told by police that he could remain silent and be represented
by a lawyer, the conviction was unconstitutional. Today, some
politicians and police representatives are arguing that the Miranda-izing
process is hampering law enforcement and making bookkeepers out
of police officers. Is it time to reconsider the strict application
of Miranda rules? What revisions are not only good policy but
also Constitutional?